Thx Capt.
@ Hawg.
Yeah, but TBH results were about like anticipated. Ie; poor by MY standards at any appreciable distances. TBH i even wonder why the hexa rifling with that slow a twist?
Point being that that slow a twist means roundball, and why a hexagonal bore for roundball? Only reasonable explanation i can think of is sanctioning body of some sorts?
If not it just eludes me. What would be the point?
Yes. The lockplate seems a tad out of place but the thing is that underneath, the woodwork show no signs of alteration. Same really goes for that absolutely massive hammer, a hammer that large = slow shutter time.
On my one Sharps i drilled the "internals" of the hammer out, Sharps hammers are rather bulky too, which made for a rather profound difference. As for this one?
Might be. To a large degree i guess that comes down to if it´ll stay or not. Seeing how large and tall it is it would surely help performance.
The new liner i TIG welded in at the muzzle alright, the weld of such a stature that i honestly have a hard time taking to heart to dress it even

With my current AC/DC TIG such a job takes less current than one´d first think. Believe i ended up at like 50-55A or so and this filling out a "weld ditch" too.
The lock i´ve had a bit of trouble with. Materials involved seems on par alright, just worn and as such ..well.. Main issue IS that the axle end of the tumbler (rest has been sorted), that 4 sided bit, is worn. Like on my Monkeytail where the thing broke off i´m giving thought to cutting a fresh one out of a drill bit and harden. Guess that would stop it right in its tracks and keep the hammer a snug fit.
All is good where we´re at right now though. Golden even, why the thing is to follow me to the range today.
We´re to have a competition at the club coupled with a swap meet of sorts. From the looks of it though the forecast doesn´t exactly speak in our favor.. heavy rains and wind. To pop a few off though is a given no matter.
Slugs, for now, are the ultra heavy ones from the mold we developed for the Hayton double. That reads.. a whopping 650 grains worth but truth be told seeing the downright massive proportions and weights involved i really don´t foresee that as an issue. At all. Fit is.. like the proverbial gloooooooooove...

Granted though. The thing truly looks a million bux. It really does and i agree that it should really have a box of its own. This is also one of the reasons for the liner. As a 50cal it´ll "class in" around here and that brings that it´ll be put up against them replica offerings. With a fast twist 50cal liner the gun is thus all of a sudden a contender, even with longer/heavier boolits and of more importance.. as distances open up. A 1:16 50cal is a rather "new" take if you ask me and having the experiences i have since previously with 451 guns that just spells winner in my book. Come rain come sleet it´s even to the point where this thing´ll take duplex without breaking the least of a sweat.
Issue at hand a tad down the line though will be to develop a reasonable boolit for it, what i´m thinking as far as that is a 50cal take on the fabled Postell. No reason to reinvent the wheel. Thing is, if we just enlarge a Postell to 50cal i bet that will put it across the 600grain mark too.. Hm